A Little Something Punk 
By Sheldon Kessel
My interest in the development of punk rock was first sparked
during my years as an undergraduate music major when, as part
of a degree in composition, I had to write numerous papers
describing, in turn, all the different music that had
influenced me, topped off with every student’s nightmare – a
synthesis capstone paper. Since then, as a college
instructor, I inadvertently reexamine my own roots at the
beginning of each semester when, on the first day of class, I
ask my new students about their own
influences.
They always return the favor, and ask about
mine. “The
styles that have been with me my entire life are
straight-up top 40 pop, and hip-hop, though at different
periods in my life I’ve been obsessed with pretty much
every sub-genre of popular music out there.” It’s my standard
answer. As
they prod further, interest always peaks when they
discover that their tie-wearing teacher once had blue and
purple hair, multiple facial piercings, and played in a
punk rock band.
Indeed, I once thought of myself as a punk. Now, though I still hold my
punk-rock idealist ethics dear, I am much less confrontational
– less idealist, more realist. I do still love punk music,
punk style, and still admire the punk kids for their idealism,
but all old punks get to a point in their lives where they need
to ask, “am I still punk?” What is punk? It might help answer these
questions to do a little examination of the history of this
thing called punk.
…so that’s what I did.
I decided to focus on two proto-punk bands that exhibited many
of the widely accepted “punk
characteristics.”
I didn’t want to explore too far back in time – any study
of musical evolution could be traced back hundreds of
years, and I wanted to end the study at punk-year-zero –
1977. To get
an idea of popular punk opinion, I asked other punks who
they thought were the “first punks.” I expected everyone
to say “The Sex Pistols,” but I was hoping for
more. I was
more interested in those who exhibited some of the punk
characteristics without self-consciously trying to “be
punk.”
Like my own popular music interests which might seem arbitrary
but have gone through a logical progression based on certain
artists’ influences, and their influences in turn, punk rock
evolved culturally and musically from everything that came
before. Rock music
has, supposedly, always been about rebellion. Punk took the idea a step
further to rebel against rock. Punk tried to dismantle the
“rock star” ideal of celebrity and excess to create an ideal of
“making art for art’s sake.”
The lineage of punk can be traced all the way back to Elvis
Presley and the first wave of rock and roll in the
1950’s. After all,
rock and roll was a rebellion against mainstream society, as
was punk. The
musical style of early rock and roll was a rebellion against
conservative, romantic, sentimental pop music, as was
punk. The
differences lie in their reasons for
rebellion.
While both grew out of boredom and restlessness, 50’s
rock and rollers were bored with prosperity and general
societal conservatism, whereas punk grew out of boredom
with the nine-to-five drudgery of blue collar life in
America and with unemployment in Britain. They were all rebelling
against being told what to do by a society that could
have just as easily disposed of them. Both punk and 50’s rock
and roll were an attempt to eliminate the hierarchical
structures in the popular music machine and “ultimately -
to eliminate hierarchy, period.”
[1] They were sick of being force
fed music made by musicians and songwriters far removed from
“the real world”. “As quintessential rebellion, punk (and early
rock and roll) is based on doing the opposite of what is
expected. In that,
its raison d’etre is to shock, its point is subversion
rather than critique.”
[2] In short, the 50’s rockers
and 70’s punks were trying to make sense of their world by
creating their own reality--making art.
Pre-Punk History
Contrary to popular belief, the first real punk bands were
American rather than British. Also, the movement began in
the late 60’s to early 70’s - it was not a sudden
explosion in the mid to late 70’s. The first bands that appeared
to have a punk perspective on things and have a lasting
influence were The Velvet Underground, Iggy and the Stooges,
the MC5, and the New York Dolls--all
Americans.
At first glance one has to wonder what these bands have
in common.
With the Velvet Underground’s lilting avant-garde art
rock, the Stooges’ and MC5’s noisy cacophony, and New
York Dolls’ glam schlock, they seem like a disparate
bunch. However, despite their
vastly different musical approaches they all shared
similar ideologies that revolved around rebellion from
the accepted social and musical fabric of society,
disdain for highly polished musical skills in favor of
pure expression, and a desire for experimentation in
music, image, and lifestyle. “Tying the variations
of punk together, from its earliest origins, was a
singular yet deeply complex ideal: that pop music was to
reconfigured as a populist art and that art should be
both a confrontation with and a negation of mainstream
society.”
[3] They were the beginnings of
the underground alternative to corporate
excess.
The Velvet Underground

There is no question that The Velvet Underground was the most
influential “alternative” band ever. Period. Brian Eno was quoted as
saying, “hardly anyone bought the groups albums when they first
came out, but those who did all went on to form their own
bands.”
[4] The Velvet Underground formed
in New York City in 1965 and was made up of Lou Reed, who had
been working as a songwriter in a pop music “songfactory” known
as Pickwick Records and was already a seasoned veteran of the
music industry when the Velvets formed in
1965;
John Cale, who was a classically trained viola player and
composer and had worked with such avant-garde composers
as LaMonte Young and John Cage, and who counted Aaron
Copland among his teachers; and Sterling Morrison,
a guitar player who met Lou Reed in the Syracuse
University dorms and also lived next to Angus MacLise,
the Velvets’ first drummer.
[5] They were all young
pseudo-intellectuals interested in avant-garde art, music, and
film. They seem to
have been the first rock band to have made music purely for
musics sake, dismissing the prominent attitude of rock and
rollers that were in it for money, fame, or
sex. In
fact, Angus MacLise was so adamant about not doing it for
the money that when the band got its first paying gig -at
a high school dance- he quit because he didn’t want to
“sell out”.
[6] After MacLise quit, they got
Maureen Tucker, who was the sister of Lou Reed’s Syracuse
University roommate, to play percussion.
[7]
Andy Warhol, in January 1966, saw the Velvet Underground play
at a nightclub called Café Bizarre. Warhol was extremely
impressed with their performance and offered to hire them as
the resident band for his studio: The
Factory. At
the studio they provided music for Warhol’s film
productions as well as entertainment for parties held at
the space.
Until Warhol hired the band, his experiments with film
tended to have very little, if any, sound. It was the Velvet
Underground’s job to provide music for Warhol’s films in
an effort to make the films more accessible. In turn, Warhol
attempted to make the band more accessible by convincing
them to allow a Hungarian fashion model, Nico, to join
them onstage. Before Nico, the band
had been notoriously boring to watch live; they weren’t
theatrical, weren’t pretty, and didn’t move around much
onstage.
With the blonde supermodel gyrating her hips onstage and
occasionally singing, the Velvet Underground began to
attract a fan base.
Andy Warhol produced the Velvet Underground’s debut album
The Velvet Underground and Nico. There was very little
production -- it was recorded live, without
overdubbing. The
album formed the ideal of punk records -- to just play without
doing anything special for the recording and without
overdubbing or doing multiple takes.
They eventually went on to record three more
albums. They
never got to be anything close to “popular” but that was
sort of the point. They refused to make
music they didn’t want to make in order to be digestible
to the masses and were always more concerned with making
art than making money. They lived fast and
died young - the band went their separate ways in 1970
and were together for a total of five years. They have since
acquired a sort of cult following and continue to
influence musicians who dare to be different.
[8]
The Detroit Scene
MC5
Iggy and the
Stooges
Detroit’s MC5 (formed in 1964) and Iggy and the Stooges (formed
in 1968) came from blue collar families, whereas the Velvets
had elite backgrounds. “If the Velvets can be
considered to have fathered art-rock then Detroit’s two chief
rock exponents, the MC5 and the Stooges represented a more
primitive tradition - rock and roll as the people’s music,
requiring nothing more than a commitment from its
participants... (it was) rock honed down to its rawest
elements”
[9] While the Velvet Underground
was highly influenced by the avant-garde in art, music,
literature, and visual arts, The MC5 and The Stooges counted
free-jazz as a primary influence. They voraciously consumed
albums by such jazz artists as Albert Ayler, John Coltrane,
Pharoh Sanders, Archie Shepp, and Sun Ra.
[10] In fact, on the MC5’s first
album there is a cover of “Starship” by Sun
Ra. Iggy Pop
said of the early Stooges “We weren’t interested in
anything like writing a song or making a chord
change. Our
early music was flowing and very conceptual.”
[11]
The MC5’s most notable contribution to the punk movement was
its political agenda. They formed the White Panther
party, modeled after the Black Panthers and participated in
such activities as bombing a CIA recruiting office on the
campus of the University of Michigan.
[12] “It was a midwesternized
version of anarchy. Tear down the walls, get the
government out of our lives, smoke lots of dope, have lots of
sex, and make lots of noise.”
[13] They paved the way for the
politics of the Sex Pistols, The Clash, and such present day
political punks as Bad Religion and
Propaghandi.
Iggy and the Stooges were the little brothers of the
MC5. They hung out
together, played shows together, and even got signed to Electra
Records at the same time.
[14] While the MC5 gave punk its
politics, the MC5 and the Stooges together gave punk its
roaring noise, Iggy Pop of the Stooges gave punk its stage
antics. It was
Iggy who did such things as cut himself onstage, roll around in
broken glass, spit on the audience and expect them to spit
back, have sex onstage, and pass out onstage from various
intoxicants. Iggy
Pop, influenced by his friend (and sometime lover) David Bowie,
was also important for contributing to the trend of androgyny
in 70’s rock stardom. Speaking of
androgyny....
The New York Dolls
New York
Dolls
The New York Dolls formed in early 1977 and began as a
bass-less threesome called Actress, determined to bring back
the sound of simple blues-based rock and
roll. They
were serious about the music, and about being musicians,
so they were rehearsing almost daily throughout 1971,
even though they didn’t find a bass player until October
of that year. They were, admittedly,
poor musicians, but hoped that through constant
rehearsing, and by perfecting their unorthodox image,
they could shake things up a bit. They became the house
band at the Mercer Arts Center in New York City which
featured bands, art exhibits, videos, avant-garde films,
and plays.
They gathered a following at the Mercer Center and
acquired the funds to embark on a European
tour.
During the debauchery of their European tour the Dolls’
original drummer died form a barbiturate overdose, but it
didn’t slow the band down. They returned to the States,
hired a new drummer, and began work on their debut album which
was the culmination of all their gigging and rehearsing up to
that point.
Although they did truly want to be better musicians, they still
lacked technical finesse, but didn’t try to hide that fact –
becoming one of the first bands to display the non-technical
instrumental techniques of punk. They played raw blues, taking
rock and roll back to its roots uncluttered by technical
bravado.
So what!?
Although there were many more pre-punk bands that deserve
mention, including the Ramones, Television, The Modern Lovers,
Patti Smith, Suicide, Richard Hell and the Voidoids, and
Blondie, the four bands that I have included here have had the
most lasting influence of all the pre-punk American
bands. They typify
the ideals, musical styles, and lifestyles that have come to be
known as Punk.
[1]
Marcus,
Lipstick Traces, p.
65
[2]
Davies,
“The Future of ‘No Future,’” Journal of
Popular Culture, Vol. 29.4, p.
14
[3]
Fairchild,
“’Alternative’ Music and the Politics of Cultural
Autonomy,” Popular Music and Society, Vol.
19.1, p. 18
[4]
Fricke, Peel Slowly and See, p.
4
[12]
McNeil
and McCain, p.47
|